Home Music ‘Wealthy Males North of Richmond’ referenced in GOP major debate : NPR

‘Wealthy Males North of Richmond’ referenced in GOP major debate : NPR

0
‘Wealthy Males North of Richmond’ referenced in GOP major debate : NPR

[ad_1]

Oliver Anthony performs in Moyock, North Carolina, on Saturday.

Virginian Pilot/TNS / Tribune Information Service/Getty Pictures


cover caption

toggle caption

Virginian Pilot/TNS / Tribune Information Service/Getty Pictures


Oliver Anthony performs in Moyock, North Carolina, on Saturday.

Virginian Pilot/TNS / Tribune Information Service/Getty Pictures

The primary Republican major debate opened up with a nod to a breakout nation music, “Wealthy Males North of Richmond,” that has achieved the bizarre feat of topping the Billboard 100 chart virtually in a single day.

The music, which is being hailed by some as a sort of “hillbilly elegy” for the working class, comes from a beforehand unknown singer who goes by the title Oliver Anthony.

It rails in opposition to the hardship of taxation, but additionally in opposition to individuals on welfare — and it additionally nods to a conspiracy idea that has grow to be a mainstay of the far proper.

In a single lyric, Anthony says, “I want politicians would look out for miners / And never simply minors on an island someplace.”

YouTube

The point out of “minors on an island” is known to discuss with the Jeffrey Epstein scandal; although Epstein died in jail in 2019, the circumstances round his demise proceed to feed conspiratorial considering.

“[That] actually opened up lots of people to conspiratorial content material that they may haven’t in any other case interacted with,” stated Jared Holt, senior researcher on the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. Holt stated anxieties round COVID-19 and false narratives round a stolen election have been typically combined in with content material that was skeptical about Epstein’s demise, bringing individuals additional alongside the breadcrumb path of conspiratorial considering.

In one other taped interview on his public YouTube web page, Anthony additionally speaks about his concern over human trafficking and says “one of many worst issues a human can do is benefit from a toddler.”

Collectively, these notes hit on themes which might be foundational to the QAnon conspiracy idea.

That conspiracy idea revolves round a baseless declare that elites (these whom Anthony may name the “Wealthy Males North of Richmond”) are secretly trafficking youngsters for intercourse and to reap their blood.

It’s intently tied in with the anti-Semitic blood libel and has helped lay the groundwork for an ethical panic round youngsters being focused by pedophiles, which at present has propelled violent extremists to focus on LGBTQ individuals and their allies.

Of specific notice is the best way through which this music went viral. “It form of unfold as an anthem,” stated Holt. “How I encountered it was by political channels fairly than music-focused channels. It is not like Pitchfork wrote up the music.”

Holt stated that it is typical for political actions to latch onto cultural artifacts like music or films to broaden their attain. However on this case, Holt warned that the people seizing on the music might lead unsuspecting audiences into their extremist spheres.

Among the many early on-line boosters of the music have been Matt Walsh, a far-right commentator who has fanned anti-LGBTQ sentiment. Walsh posted the music to his X account, to 1 million views. Jack Posobiec, a rightwing activist who promoted the false Pizzagate conspiracy idea and has documented ties with white nationalists, shared it on his X account to greater than 5 million views.

“What’s regarding is how this music is getting used and the kind of figures who’re attaching themselves to the music, particularly on the again of its success,” stated Holt. “And if these far-right figures are profitable in associating themselves instantly with the music, it might probably open up a wider viewers that they may usually not have entry to on a regular basis.”

This reporting initially appeared in our dwell weblog. Revisit how the controversy unfolded.

[ad_2]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here